Oh it's ok, I haven't been sat here sulking iike a moody teenager (the girlfriend came to visit, which is why I've been quiet, as she takes over my entire life when she's here!).
Actually, it's quite interesting to see what people make of academic electronic music in general? I studied all this stuff about six years ago when I did my Masters in music at Huddersfield University, and I must admit that academics seem to go wild for pieces where not very much happens (the ultimate being John Cage's 4:33, where literally nothing happens, of course). I thought Eliane's stuff was the best of a bad bunch, if you know what I mean? This has been my experience of academia in general - that academics seem to be impressed by stuff that anyone (else) who's really into gear or synths would immediately think - 'but that's just one note, held down on a whatever, for six minutes!'. It's like the academics are actually behind what's going on in the real world, when surely it should be the other way around? I found parts of my lectures really, really frustrating. For example, we did a whole term on 'noise', and somehow they failed to mention stuff like Sunn ((0)). It's like they've got a blind spot when it comes to anything that doesn't fall into their little hermetic world.
I can't think of many people who've used the ARP 2500 in a strictly pop music context, though? They're so large and rare that I think a lot of them got installed in universities or academies, and so have never had their full potental explored in terms of making actual tunes or pieces of music where there's chord sequences or something more accessible. I did know about Close Encounters...that was one of my first exposures to synths, along with Jarre, the Human League, Dr Who and so on...