Join music gear discussions on Equipboard. Talk about guitar gear, electronic music production, get help identifying gear, ask for feedback on your music, suggest ideas to improve Equipboard and more.

Analog vs Digital

Welcome all suggestions regarding analog vs digital tone structure and sound content.

I remember working on a record where we were using Drexel's studio A and B right when protools HD came out and the wholeplace had been upgraded to 192k and this student was like "so what do you guys think of 'THE digital'?"

that is all

GEAR:
  • Roland Juno-6
  • Gibson SG Standard
  • Vox AC30 Guitar Combo Amp

For me, it's all about the feel.

I started playing guitar back in 1986 at the age of 15. Between that time and 1998 / 99 when the Line 6 POD came out, most digital effects sounded very processed. That's not to say they sounded terrible. In those days, there was a lot of experimentation with sound effects going on. From 1998 to the present time, digital emulation and modeling technology have come a long way in terms of quality of sound and accuracy of modeling.

One of the benefits of digital audio is making and storing an exact representation of your tone. Tube amplifiers are a great example of the opposite. While you will find amazing sounding tube amps, not all tube amps sound the same, even within the same brand, model, and run. There are always little (albeit minute) variations in tone. With the current digital effects processors and amp modelers (i.e. HELIX, AxeFX, etc.) once you dial in your sound, you can lock it in by merely pressing or tapping the save button. You can take that file and upload it to any DAW, effects workstation, or floor equipment, and it will sound the same.

GEAR:
  • Line 6 Powercab 112 Plus
  • Ibanez AZ2402
  • Line 6 Helix LT Guitar Multi-effects Processor

I've only ever had experince with Analog effects.

GEAR:
  • Washburn T-24 Taurus Bass
  • Gibson EB-3
  • Epiphone Les Paul Custom Pro Koa - Limited Edition

clifford, you have a marshall major? where the hell can you turn that thing up these days?

GEAR:
  • Roland Juno-6
  • Gibson SG Standard
  • Vox AC30 Guitar Combo Amp

I'm not sure if you mean turn up one for sale or turn up one volume-wise so I'll just say both.

My dad bought it in the 80's or 90's, put it in storage for a while, I recently pulled it out of storage.

I also live on a ranch out in the middle of nowhere, my dad's a big rock fan, I can crank the amp up as loud as I want.

GEAR:
  • Washburn T-24 Taurus Bass
  • Gibson EB-3
  • Epiphone Les Paul Custom Pro Koa - Limited Edition

Each one has its place. It really boils down to what suits you best. Keep in mind that some people like certain digital pedals because they sound like analog units.

I remember working on a record where we were using Drexel's studio A and B right when protools HD came out and the wholeplace had been upgraded to 192k and this student was like "so what do you guys think of 'THE digital'?"

that is all

This made me chuckle.

GEAR:
  • sE Electronics V7
  • Fender Vintage Series '57 Stratocaster
  • Blank slot

that is all

This made me chuckle.

THE digital

GEAR:
  • Roland Juno-6
  • Gibson SG Standard
  • Vox AC30 Guitar Combo Amp

I also live on a ranch out in the middle of nowhere, my dad's a big rock fan, I can crank the amp up as loud as I want.

I'm jealous. I wish I could crank my amp up. I live in a townhouse, so I have to be mindful of my neighbors. I want to set my amp free!

GEAR:
  • Reverend Warhawk DAW
  • Gibson Les Paul Standard
  • Friedman BE-OD Deluxe

try hybrid. It's a bit work, but it will worth it

Issue is that sound guys and bar owners will have a heart attack if you walk in with a stack (let alone a Marshall Major! Gadzooks!)

With the advent of quieter stages, thankfully digital (and digital combined with Class D amplification solutions) are really, really close to the tone and feel of a cranked amp at reasonable volumes.

Should you still wish to run tube amps (and who doesn't?!), there are a number of reactive load solutions that allow you to turn things down at home and on stage (including those with IR options for live and studio use).

GEAR:
  • Fender Telecaster
  • Universal Audio Dream '65 Reverb Amplifier
  • Norman ST40

I have tried to work with digital effects but it just doesn’t work for me. I just prefer analog cuz it’s easier to work with

GEAR:
  • EMG EMG-KFK Kerry King 81/85 Humbucker Set
  • Behringer UM300 Ultra Metal
  • Blank slot

I read a lot but most of the fiction I read I now download to a Kindle for convenience. I still like to buy "nice" books every once in a while however and quite often seek out rare or unusual hardback editions of books I know I'll return to.

I have a similar sentiment towards gear. I love that so much stuff is available digitally simulated; it's great that there are so many resources to download and experiment with, often already integrated or as free plugins. "Warehouses" of gear can be owned cheaply and virtually without taking up an inch of physical space. As a purely recreational player I've enjoyed gathering together a handful of analog pedals; assembling a modest pedalboard, of boring old 'classics' unlikely to excite any pulses or raise any eyebrows ...pedals I consider to be the standards (or budget clones thereof) against which all others are judged. Analog vs Digital is an odd debate which i think can only be answered, Yes.

GEAR:
  • Epiphone Casino Coupe
  • Pignose "Legendary" 7-100
  • Hohner Marine Band 1896 Diatonic Harmonica

Both can be great, I would say this is just another color to the tone, thats why you choose digital or analog, when there is a choice. Only in some cases you will not find much of a diffrence, when you want then some you need another solution.

GEAR:
  • Squier 40th Anniversary Jazzmaster Vintage Edition
  • Fender Hot Rod Deluxe IV
  • EarthQuaker Devices Plumes

if I had an iron back and a lot of money - I would only use analog. And not because of the sound, but because of the fetish. because now I've switched to pod go and it's saved me fitness before gigs and money because I stopped buying new stuff for my pedalboard all the time.

GEAR:
  • Line 6 POD Go
  • Line 6 FM4 Filter Modeler
  • ESP Edwards E-ST-125ALR

I am a young guitarist and I'm in my second year. Humbly speaking, however, I'm actually quite good. All I desperately need to learn now is arpeggios and pinch harmonics before my mentor considers my journey "done"; I run a Jackson JS12 through a Fender Mustang LT25. YEs, A DIGiTAl aMp. OooOoOOh. but it's awesome. the variation and ability to edit the tones is just wonderful. Like, i can create brand new digital presets ~~ just for me ~~ and on the second day i had nailed the tone from message in a bottle. sure i am lazy and poor not to have pedals, and i just don't care. and honestly, tube amps are annoying expensive. and this amp does tonnes more than analog while still sounding awesome. so eh

Both analog and digital have their place, and I like seeing when artists use analog equipment on stage... but digital equipment is good for those who wish to still get the tones of an amp that they might want but don't necessarily have to worry as much about the cost.

The thing I also like about digital plugins is the ability to replicate guitar tones––I once replicated Daron Malakian's guitar tone from the first System Of A Down album in AmpliTube 5 based solely on footage and what audio engineer Sylvia Massy had described about how the guitars were recorded, and I got it pretty dang close. Tone replication like that is definitely a niche, but it is one of my favorite things to do (even if it can be time consuming).

GEAR:
  • Squier Precision Affinity PJ
  • Fender Rumble 25
  • M-Audio M-Track Solo