Let me know if this is something that is doable / desirable.
This is definitely doable, and it sounds like the community wants it, so we're all ears. The challenge is to standardize the data - as in like how we structure it on the backend - to where it's specific enough and useful for users, but also widely applicable to a lot of artist/gear submissions?
So, how should we standardize it? I'm leaning towards "Dates Owned/Used" since that can be a year, a decade, or a span (and it encompasses "first known use" right?).
So it could be 1978. Or 1970s. Or 1970-1978.
As per this idea I think the specific artist eras are hard to scale across artists (I mean, relatively few artists are iconic like Prince and have eras people talk about). But one thing we have thought about is pulling album data, and then you could select what albums the gear was relevant in.
Thoughts?
Fantastic! Im so glad that you are onboard!
Without being pedantic, I think that it would be beneficial to have both the year ('Date Owned' as a suggested heading) and album ('Albums Appeared On' as a suggested heading).
For example, with Daft Punk, there are bits of gear that we know they were using in 1998, but weren't known to be used on any of their released projects. As such, for something like that, just a 'Date Owned' would suffice.
Sticking with the Daft Punk example, for their SP-1200, that could have 'Date Owned' to indicate when they were first known to have obtained it (I think it was 95 off the top of my head), and the 'Albums Appeared On' would be - Homework & Discovery.
I don't know if this would cause confusion or issues when it comes to ordering, but let me know if this is doable!
Regardless, either one of the two fields would be incredible to see! Thanks