[...] I think a boss superfuzz is a big component of electric wizard's tone. Any octave fuzz in the foxx tone machine and univox superfuzz camp will probably work, but not an octavia. It's hard to really talk about doom without talking 50 watt+ tube heads, apart from the melvins who are doom adjacent, volume is a big part of the idiom even in the studio. The sound you hear recorded is usually the live rig. Modelled amps to try would be the laney supergroup, orange or120, hiwatt dr103, any sound city head, marshall super bass, ampeg v4b, vt40 or even an svt. Let me look at what neural dsp has to offer.
OK, based on your great guidance here (thank you), I did some more digging.
Apparently there are a ton of dudes trying to get that EW Dopethrone-era tone. Lots of good YT vids. Also, I sifted through more doom/stoner/sludge tracks to find other players who had that on-record tone I crave, and Monolord's first two records jumped out at me... and what I'm hearing there is (no surprise) nearly the exact same recipe as EW: 24.75" scale guitar tuned all the way down to B (or even Bb or A in some cases... jxsus...), humbuckers that aren't super hot/high-output, Boss FZ-2 Hyper Fuzz, various genre-staple amps and mic'd cabs (lots of Orange) cranked up loud. As for bass, it's various 4-string Rick and P-bass derivatives tuned town to match the guitar, passed through their own FZ-2, Big Muff Bass, or similar, and a mic'd up SVT-based rig.
So this makes things pretty clear for me.
My current outlook re: options for Electric Wizard doom tone:
#1 The real deal studio doom:
- Humbucker-equipped guitar properly setup to handle tuning down to B, Bb/A# or A.
- Boss FZ-2 Hyper Fuzz or clone equivalent (Behringer SF300 or one of many boutique options)
- An amp with the power to get loud AF without screwing up the FZ-2's natural dominance over everything else in the chain. (Sound Studio B120 bass/PA amp was used on Dopethrone).
- mic'd cabinet in a studio space that allows for deafening volume.
#2 Deluxe bedroom doom:
- same guitar
- same pedal
- same amp
- amp attenuator and cab sim. Cab sim could be hardware or software based... but hardware cab sim means not having to worry about latency.
#3 Mid-tier bedroom doom:
- same guitar
- same pedal
- amp AND cab sim, either as hardware (a la Walrus Audio Mako series) or software suite.
#4 Totally ITB doom:
- same guitar
- octave-fuzz, amp and cab sim all in software
EDIT: apart from their Morgan suite, the amps listed on Neural DSP's site seem too metal, neural seems pretty wrong for doom, although Matt Pike is a slo100 man now so you could do high on fire tones...
I started diving into Neural and I see what you mean. I'd demo everything that's demo-able before making the final call, but YT and forum-going doomers seem big on various options from STL, Line 6's native stuff or just a bunch of free options.
As for how I'd go, option #1 just isn't possible for me, but I'd probably pick up a cheap-but-decent SG-style guitar, work on getting it to play well down at B standard (find the right beefy strings, action & truss setup, etc), then add a Behringer SF300 (because why not? it's so cheap). and then start working through my free options for amp and cab sim to see if any of them get me there. If the latency became a drag, I'd start looking to option 3, but with external amp & cab sim.
For bass, I'd just use this as an excuse to add a 5-string to my collection, and live with the fact that it won't have the exact same flabby tone as a 4-string Rick tuned down to B.