daryl_skinner's Reviews
30 reviews Back to daryl_skinner's Equipboard
629
Why is this microphone not popular?
I bought myself the re-issue in black finish called the PL80a. Comparing it to my current microphones I am genuinely surprised why this microphone isn't popular.
It's a supercardioid microphone and it has excellent off axis rejection. Tone wise, it's basically a poor man's Sennheiser BF521. I compared them in a mix and to be honest they sound more or less indistinguishable. Of course by BF521 I mean the first generation non-neodymium BF 521, not the bright neodymium BF 521 II.
Now the bad part. It uses a neodymium magnet but its output is no better than microphones that use ferrite magnet. To be honest its output is more or less same as my BF 521. It's kinda weirdly shaped for a handheld microphone and is uncomfortable to hold compared to a SM58, but if you use it as an instrument microphone or if you use it in a stand then it won't be a problem.
If you're a guitarist and you want a cheap alternative to the old BF 521 or the old MD 421-U then this microphone is your best bet. As for vocalists, well if you prefer use your vocal microphones mounted on a stand then go for this microphone, for folks who like to hold their microphone, it isn't the most comfortable microphone to hold on to.
629
Best DAW with the least learning curve.
Let me be honest, I am the least tech savvy person you'll ever find. I have always found DAWs difficult to use because I get overwhelmed by their overcomplicated interfaces. I am well versed with working with analog decks but working with DAWs have always been a challenge to me.
However with the Mixbus32C I felt right at home. The interface is very reminiscent of real recording decks and is very easy to use for someone who is not well versed with DAWs. It's highly stable and its UI helps folks like me to get on with the digital age of music production.
629
One of the best dynamic microphone ever made.
I bought it used in mint condition and the variant I have bought is the non-neodymium one. It lacks the frequency roll-off knob of MD 421-U but since I'll be using it to record guitars it's not a big deal for me.
There is also a neodymium variant out there called BF 521 II (The product code is written on the mounting notch) which is basically a MD 421 II without the frequency roll-off knob, but I prefer the sound signature of this non-neodymium variant. The neodymium variant tends to sound scratchy to my ears.
It isn't as neutral sounding as my Lewitt MTP 440 DM but for some reason it works better for recording Vox amps than the 440 DM. It pairs nicely with my Beyerdynamic M130 and to my ears it's a far better combination for recording Vox amps than the industry standard Shure SM57 & Royer R121 combination.
629
Best ribbon mic for Vox amps
I replaced my sE Electronics VR1 ribbon mic with this ribbon mic. The VR1 was a great ribbon mic and honestly with modern amps like Mesa Rectifier, Randall Thrasher, etc it works far better than the M130. It's neutral frequency response works great with the modern high gain amps but with Vox amps the M130 just sounds better. I realized that sometimes the most neutral mic isn't the most perfect mic for all amps. The mid-range of the M130 just works perfect for Vox amps.
629
Shure SM57 and Sennheiser MD421-II hybrid albeit with shoddy accessories.
Honestly, I am surprised by the quality of this microphone. I bought it as a cheap junker mic to use live but after using this I am happy as well as bummed all at the same time. I am bummed because I still can't believe that a $40 microphone can sound better than a SM57, it makes no sense but somehow it does.
Now about the part of me being happy, I am astonished by how it sounds like a cross between Sennheiser MD421-II and Shure SM57, that's just unbelievable for such a cheap microphone. As for its build quality, it doesn't have the Sherman tank like build quality of my Lewitt but it's at least as well built as the SM57
Now the bad part, the accessories in the box suck. The clip that comes in the box is utter junk and it became loose after a week of usage. Forget about being usable, the hinge on the clip became so loose that it can't hold the microphone in place anymore. The threads on the hinge screw ripped out when I tried to tighten it. The storage bag is utter joke, its seams tore out within 2 weeks of usage and then the crappy leatherette material started to flake off. Then again for $40 they are okay.
Update: It stopped working for no reason. Quite a bummer that it turned out to be unreliable, because it's was a good microphone.
629
Does what it claims.
It's fairly cheap and easy to use. It does have some impact on the sustain, but it isn't a big deal.
629
Highly customizable loop switcher.
I learnt the hard way that tap dancing around pedals is a bad idea. So, I decided to go for a loop switcher. I went for this loop switcher instead of readily available ones from name brands because of the customization options offered by Buzz Electronics. The options for volume pedal insert, & pre tone-stack and post tone-stack loops is quite nifty.
629
Highly impressed
It's an old school analog bucket brigade flanger and when it comes to the flanging effect it stands neck to neck with the MXR Flanger. I never expected a cheap flanger pedal to be this good.
629
Very accurate, hifi and neutral sounding ribbon mic.
It's a different kind of ribbon microphone. When compared side by side with Royer R121 it doesn't have the mid-range honk, it has a very clean, detailed, and neutral mid-range.
As for the low end, once again, it's very uncolored, clean but extended. The biggest surprise is the high end. It has a more extended high end than other ribbon microphones, however its high end is very clean and it has the warmth that you expect from a ribbon microphone.
The best description of this microphone will be that it's highly accurate, hifi, but at the same time it has the warmth of a ribbon microphone. It captures sound sources with utmost accuracy, but at the same time imparts smoothness to them. I like it better than the Royer R121, which is quite surprising when you consider the fact that this microphone costs just $400. It looks hideous though.
1268
Do you still find it hideous? It does have a very industrial looking design but its looks have grown on me.
629
Well, I sold it off. It was just too hifi and sterile sounding for my tastes, and I still find it hideous looking when compared to other ribbon microphones. I use a Beyerdynamic M130 these days, it just works better for recording Vox amps and it looks sleek.
629
Still remains the industry standard.
Can't go wrong with the Shure SM57. It has a history unlike any other microphone, and it has been used in some of the greatest hits ever produced. I have used it for many gigs and it has never failed me.
629
Unbelievably good microphone for its price.
I bought this microphone after my old and trusty Shure SM57 was misplaced after a gig. I love the SM57 but I have to admit that this is a vastly better microphone than SM57, or any other $100 microphone.
The best thing I like about it is that how uncolored it is. I have had my experiences with fair share of uncolored dynamic microphones in studios like the Sennheiser MD441U, and Shure KSM8. Although this microphone isn't as uncolored as those high end dynamic microphones, but it's great for its price. I actually prefer it over the Sennheiser MD421-II, which is a quite huge achievement for a $100 microphone.
629
Downright terrible speaker
The best thing I did with these speaker was to replace them. They sounded terrible, unless you have some sort of odd penchant for boxy, scratchy, muffled and lifeless guitar tones you'll find these speakers to be terrible. They make the AC4C1 sound really terrible. With them the AC4 has this cheap scratchy tin can kind of sound. My amp came to life after I replaced them with Weber Ceramic Blue Pup speakers. I can't believe out of all speakers Vox choose to put this piece of junk in an otherwise nice amp.
629
Best speakers for the AC4C1 1x10" combo amp.
There were multiple reasons for me buying these speakers. Of course the biggest reason was that a bloke was selling them on Reverb for just $70, so I couldn't miss out on such a sweet deal. The other reason was that I heard the Alnico Blue Pup doesn't fit in the small space of AC4C1 without modifications to the amp, so the Ceramic Blue Pup was the next best choice.
The one I have is a 20-watt variant with pre-rola dope. It sounds great with the AC4, and is a dramatic improvement over the stock VX10 speaker. The excellent performance of this speaker was a major reason why I opted for its bigger brother the 12" Ceramic Blue Dog for my Vox AC100 CPH. It has the chime of an Alnico Blue with the fast low end response that you expect from a ceramic speaker. With it my Vox AC4 sounds a lot more open.
629
Good amp marred by poor parts availability.
I have no complains against the quality of this amp. It's my go-to practice amp and it has been through a lot of usage. I did replace the stock speaker with a 10" Weber Ceramic Blue Pup speaker and the amp sounded excellent through it.
However, after a long period of usage its carry handle was damaged, I accidentally misplaced the plastic vent, and the grill cloth was ripped. So, I had to replace them, but I couldn't find cream colored Vox carry handle and vent in my local guitar store. All they had were the black ones, so I had to adjust with them. The worst part was the grill cloth, I couldn't find the "Tygon" grill cloth anywhere. I did have the regular brown Vox checkerboard cloth with me, so I had to use that instead.
I do understand that Vox has discontinued this amp and replaced it with a new variant with 12" speakers and regular brown grille cloth, but at least they should ensure proper availability of spare parts.
629
Performs as good as the pricey Mission Engineering pedals.
It's a simple no frills buffered volume pedal made by Saturnworks. The quality of buffers used by them is excellent, there's no buffer noise from this pedal, and it perfectly preserves my guitar tone. As for the sweep, it's nice and smooth. Back when I ordered it, it cost me around $100, for that price it gives pricier volume pedals a run for their money.
629
Excellent bucket brigade delay.
The second generation Ekko 616 MKII is a really clean sounding analog delay. Its cleaner repeats were a major reason why I chose it over the MXR Carbon Copy. A cool thing about its repeats is that due to their cleaner nature they tread a fine line between the bucket brigade and tape echo sound. Its tonal quality is right up in the same league as the vintage EHX Deluxe Memory Man. Another thing I like about this pedal are its external speed and depth knobs, they offer a fine control on the modulation parameters.
629
One of the best phaser pedal in its price range.
Back when I bought it it used to cost around $100. In that price range no other phaser pedals come even close to this pedal in terms of features and versatility. Forget MXR Phase 90 it gives even many pricier phaser pedals a run for their money. Unlike many of the pedals made by such lesser known Chinese brands it's actually pretty well built. It's build quality is as good as MXR pedals. By adjusting the depth, resonance and sweep knob this pedal can sound like different 4-stage phasers like Script Phase 90, Block Letter Phase 90, EHX Small Stone, etc. If you play around the knobs it can even easily go into the weird and wonky experimental territory. When it's about value for money, it's impossible to beat this phaser pedal.
629
Unbeatable in its price range.
No other chorus pedals under $100 come anywhere close to the MXR Analog Chorus in terms of sheer versatility and range.
Edit: I found a neat mod for this pedal. The through output on the pedal uses a TRS jack. When you plug a mono jack into it, it shorts across the ring and sleeve. This acts as a switch and sends the dry signal to the second output. So, what I did is I drilled a hole in the left side of the enclosure and installed a push-button micro toggle switch connected to the ring and sleeve of the second output jack. So, now that switch acts a chorus and vibrato toggle switch when the pedal is used in mono mode.
629
Best bang for the buck compressor pedal out there.
The Calvin Compressor circuit is derived from the Ross/Dynacomp family of OTA compressors. However, it adds an extended control scheme to fine tune the compression. The inclusion of attack, and threshold controls and voicing switch make it way more usable than other compressors. It's price isn't that high either, and to be honest it packs a huge bang for the buck.
629
Best Naga Viper clone.
It's a high quality clone of the Catalinbread Naga Viper. In terms of build quality it's actually as well built as the Naga Viper but costs lesser than it. The traditional Rangemaster mode is obtained on the pedal by turning the range and gain knob fully clockwise. The boost knob then functions the same way as the boost knob on a Rangemaster. The other way to use it is like Tube Screamer wherein you can turn the gain knob all the way down counter-clockwise.
I use it in many different ways with my AC100 CPH. When I want the old-school Vox and Rangemaster style tone I switch to channel 1 on my amp, dial up the gain knob and tone cut knob on the AC100 CPH to emulate the normal channel of a Vox AC30, then slam it with the Pink Treble Booster. For Black Sabbath style tone I turn the range knob counterclockwise to fatten up the overall guitar tone.
In some aggressive speed metal songs I use it to boost the channel 2. On channel 2 of my amp, I turn off the fat and bright switches. Then on my treble booster I dial the gain knob all the way back, turn the range knob all the way up and then dial the boost knob as per requirement. It gooses up the overdrive channel by just the right amount. Playing around with the range knob provides even more tonal options.
I find this pedal way more usable and versatile than the usual one or two knob kind of treble boosters, and due to the usage of silicon transistors it has a more controlled response than the germanium transistor based treble boosters.



-s.webp?v=1783782829)















