this is the last advice I am giving.... I think you received more free music advice here than I got in my entire 38 years of life....
no 2 synths are the same, even oens that have the same sound generation and parameter adjustments -- certain types of synthesis are better for different things.... there's also a big overlap in sampling and synthesis concerning envelope generators, filters etc.... basically any sampler with these subtractive synthesis elements can be made to do very synths sounds as well as treated samples if you know how to handle it and is a greay area.... then there's FM synthesis(and its cousins like phase distortion), but you are not ready for FM, its so weird it'll blow your head off.... but you would be surprised at how unsynthesized a lot of FM patches can sound... oh, and additive, additive is cool
doubt synthesis all you want, tis a powerfull tool to create sounds electronically and its possibly the broadest category of instrumentation as it can simulate various acoustic sounds in a hurry as well as create never before heard sounds... modern music is full of synth sounds that you don't think of as synths beause they have been around so long they are classic style sounds like the electric guitar snare drum
lerning how each synthesesis typ works will help you when mixing as you are shaping RAW SOUND and it will give you a good idea how to more effectively employ EQ and dynamics processing to control bandwidth and dynamic range as envelope generators and filtersfall into those 2 categories of processing...
if you want to make electronic music without any synthesizers, be my guest, its going damned well for you so far
but I think I am done here, if you know so much, DIY, dude.... whya re you asking MY opinion?
and I"ve read the bible, I probably own more translations than you including a catholic bible in latin which I practiced my latin on many times as a young man... you're a condescending little shit, maybe you oughta give genesis another read and play 'spot the 2 disparate versions of the flood story both of which are loosely lifted from the older Sumerian epic of Gilgamesh' -- just how many animals DID noah take on the Ark.... ad whoa ttended the Crucifixion or JC's birth, no 2 authors seem to agree what with the fact that there are probably no eye witness accounts in the bible and it is not a work of history. Its a lovely collection of fireside traditions (and a bunch of disputatious letters) and maybe it has some meaning and I'm offending God if he exists, but proof? it is not.... and if you don't need proof, that's good, that's the meaning of faith. I never asked you not to have faith, you asked me to change my beliefs on YOUR SAY SO. You also have no life experience. I have been married, widowed, I'm a father, I've travelled all of north amrica, much of Europe, survived trauma that's simpyly NOT YOUR BUSINESS etc etc. Apart from being well-educated and autodidactic I've seen things that have formed my views for decades and I'm entitled to my opinions without some 20 year old kid shoving their opinion down my throat on a nonrelated message board inbetween asking me for advice about his crappy music or soliciting compliments on his mediocre graphic design endeavors. If I am wrong I am entitled to be, I think if I didn't have that basic right from birth I have earned it thru sheer grueling life experience...
I am totally done with this thread and you... I have dumped way too much of my free time into this (wtching a Christian propaganda film was the kicker last night) and I am using the day off I engineered by working doubley hard yesterday to finally do some stuff for myself for a change.