gchiaren's Reviews
11 reviews Back to gchiaren's Equipboard
37599
Perfect small practice FRFR speaker
I mostly play and practice at home, and I had a list of criteria that was pretty specific for a guitar speaker - I wanted one that did not color the sound in any way, would take pedals well (with an amp-sim pedal in the chain providing the core tone), have a headphone output for silent practice, have Bluetooth to jam along with tracks, and preferably have an understated look.
I first learned about full-range, flat-response speakers and had nearly decided on the Headrush FRFR-108. Thankfully, I discovered the FRFR Go before buying, and I was immediately sold.
I mean, you couldn’t really match the specs any better to my needs. In terms of form factor and looks, it’s actually much smaller than I thought! It’s just about 1 ft wide, super light, and as a design snob I love its simplicity. With other FRFR speakers looking like either stage wedges or traditional guitar cabs, it’s nice that the FRFR Go looks like a modern/minimal bookshelf Bluetooth speaker. Point is, it should fit right in wherever you want to put it. The fit & finish is great, it feels well-built and the knobs are stylish and high quality.
My signal chain is guitar ➡️ drive pedals ➡️ amp/cab sim pedal ➡️ time/space pedals ➡️ FRFR Go. Depending on your other gear, you’ll need to experiment with INPUT VOLUME and MAIN VOLUME. Balancing the two will minimize distortion from high-gain pedals. You’ve also got BASS and TREBLE knobs which are nice and responsive, to sculpt your tone further (I keep mine at 2 o’clock). I’ve set the Volume and Gain on my amp sim pedal to about noon, fwiw.
Considering the price and how small it is, the sound quality is outstanding. It’s pretty much exactly what I wanted. Total power is 30W so it’s not loud enough to hang with band practice, but that’s also not what it’s designed for. For jamming in your home it’s perfect. I do find I can get it to crack a bit depending on drive pedals, pickup config, etc but this could also be due to me needing to play with the gain through the whole chain. As it stands I do wish it had a little more headroom but not a deal-breaker by any means.
When I plug my headphones into it, it sounds awesome. No complaints. I do find I need to crank the main volume a bit with headphones but that’s probably due my headphone’s impedance.
The Bluetooth works great. My iPhone connects to it seamlessly, and I can stream my favorite tracks and jam along with them and feel like I’m in the band lol. Especially with headphones on.
Apparently it has a rechargeable battery good for 13 hrs but my FRFR Go stays put so I don’t have a review on that. Oh and it also has an aux in, which I haven’t tried but makes it even more versatile.
All in all, the Headrush FRFR Go is awesome. There are certainly other small practice options for bedroom guitarists, but the vast majority are amp modelers which makes them more complex and expensive. The FRFR Go is PERFECT if you’re already generating your tone digitally and need a way to faithfully reproduce it, while throwing in tons of thoughtful features that guitarists need when practicing and playing in small spaces.
37599
Improves on the ProCo RAT in every way
This pedal got on my radar after seeing it on Paul Banks' pedalboard (of Interpol fame). I was testing out numerous distortion pedals and trying to find the one for my board (for the music I play I don't mind owning multiple fuzz boxes, but not sure I need more than one great distortion).
I should also mention that I'm a fan of the ProCo RAT sound in general, though I don't necessarily want the original on my board. With the Woodcutter, the story goes that the founders of BIG EAR had what they considered to be the "holy grail unit" RAT, so they cloned it and made the LM308-powered Woodcutter.
The RAT's built like a tank, but too big and bulky for my liking. Conversely the Woodcutter is a normal sized stompbox enclosure and is minimal and beautiful. The knobs in particular stand out - they're made of metal and feel amazing to turn. Build quality of the Woodcutter is 5/5, no questions about durability.
True to the RAT, it has 3 knobs - GAIN, VOLUME, and TONE. GAIN is like the RAT's DISTORTION knob. And man, the Woodcutter has plenty of it on tap. Below noon the distortion stays pretty "light" and manageable. Definitely not a replacement for an overdrive pedal, I wouldn't call it the least bit transparent. At noon and beyond, it really sings. Truthfully past 3 o'clock I can't tell much of a difference. The TONE knob has a very wide range; turning it clockwise muffles the sound, while counterclockwise opens it up and lets those high frequencies through.
At the end of the day, I bought the Woodcutter bc it sounds like a RAT, only better. It's louder and a bit more gnarly than a RAT, but it manages to stay true to it and not go off the rails. In my experience it also plays very well with fuzz pedals. I know ProCo RAT is considered by many to be kinda fuzzy itself, but part of what I like about this clone is that it stays more in the distortion range.
This is an easy 5/5 for me. I don't foresee taking the Woodcutter off my board anytime soon.
Preferred Settings + Usage:
GAIN between noon and 2 o'clock, VOLUME at noon, TONE at 10-11 o'clock. I play it through a Fender Blues Junior.
37599
A unique distortion/fuzz that stands out
I play mostly garage rock/blues rock/alternative. I happened to fall in love with this pedal at the NAMM show. Each year I attend I like to make a short list of 5 or so things that excite me and that I plan to possibly buy over that year. I was hanging out at the JHS booth and spent way too much of my time playing with this bright orange little box.
So this is based off the Lovetone Big Cheese, which admittedly I know very little about. Officially it's classified as a "fuzz/distortion" pedal, which I would completely agree with. What motivated me to buy it was... well, I can't get enough of dirt pedals. They're so easy to switch in and out, and you never know when you find one that just hits a sweet spot.
Not much to say about the build quality, it's JHS so ya know it's gonna be solid. The bright orange paint and simple graphic is pretty distinctive and will pop on the pedalboard.
The bread & butter of the Cheese Ball and the knob worth discussing is the mode selector switch which has settings OFF - 1 - 2 - 3. The OFF mode is supposedly the brightest and lowest gain mode, but I quite like it. The pedal sounds very open and jangly in that mode, the gain knob is nice and responsive and the tone knob is disabled. This is probably more the Cheese Ball's distortion side, wouldn't quite call it fuzz yet.
Setting 1 is totally different. It's very mid-scooped. Not in a metal tone kinda way... more like a 90s grunge/alt-rock sort of vibe. In fact I love it for that. I almost consider mode 1 to be like a bonus pedal within a pedal. The mid scooped sound is not as unwieldy, and thus plays well with other pedals, like overdrive.
Setting 2 I probably use the least, just because it's neither here nor there. From setting 1, it adds more gain and more mids. This is the point where it starts to sound more like a fuzz pedal.
Setting 3 is a beast, and we've landed in fuzz territory. In fact, if you turn up the gain knob it gates the sound, kinda like your speaker is on the verge of dying. Very velcro, as they say. All in all I would say you need to experience this pedal in OFF and setting 3, with setting 1 being suited to a very specific style of rock.
I was a little hesitant that played through my setup the Cheese Ball would disappoint me considering I initially played it at an exciting music gear trade show, but all fear was put to rest when I heard it ripping through my Blues Junior. I have a Gibson ES-325 I adore with Gibson mini-humbucking pickups that pair really nicely with the Cheese Ball (the cheese puns are unstoppable). In an ocean full of drive pedals vying for my attention, the JHS Cheese Ball is unique enough where I can confidently say I'll have it for a while
37599
Amazing sound and comfort
The Beyerdynamic DT 770 PRO-80 Closed Studio Headphones are absolutely amazing. Granted they're the most high-end headphones I've ever tried, but I honestly cannot imagine how another pair can sound that much better than these. I've owned headphones in the $100-120 range from Sony, Audio-Technica, and Sennheiser, and some more expensive Beats headphones (hey nobody's perfect). I wasn't exactly looking for new headphones, but I got a chance to borrow these from a music producer friend, and was absolutely blown away from the moment I heard some sound come through them.
The mid and high frequencies are so well balanced, and the bass is nice and rounded and full. I can see why these are often near the top of the list for music producers that need a good bass response. I've used these to produce music, play guitar, and for casual listening, and they excel in all areas.
Finally, I can't say enough good things about how comfortable they are. I only feel the need to take a break every handful of hours, which is better than I can say for all the other headphones I have owned or tried. The pads are super soft, and the DT 770s are overall very light, so you'll almost forget you're wearing headphones at all (if it wasn't for the sweet sweet sounding music engulfing your ears and brain).
If you're in the market for new over-ear headphones for studio or casual use and can stretch the budget to around $200, don't make a buying decision until you've given these a shot. It won't take long for you to fall in love with em, trust me on that.
627
Cannot decide between the DT 770 Pro 80 Ohm and the DT 250 80 Ohm.
How does the DT 770 handles mids and highs?
Thanks!
37599
DT 770 vs. DT 250 ... that's a great question! I sampled the DT 250 before settling on the DT 770. They are pretty different, imho. The DT 250s I can best describe as more flat and even. You don't get the feeling that any frequency range is exaggerated in any way. What got me about the DT 770 was how full they sound. I think this is in part to a slightly greater bass response, but there was something about how it all came together that really made me feel the music more with these.
To answer your question specifically, I think the mids and highs sound beautiful on the DT 770. The mids are very present, I can pick up lots of nuances when I listen to "softer" music. The highs are also well balanced, not shrill at all, and I think that partially contributes to being able to wear these for hours before your ears fatigue.
I don't want to take anything away from the DT 250, since they get pretty rave reviews as well. I think it largely depends on your application, maybe a mixing/mastering engineer would opt for the DT 250 for a flatter, more even response. My applications were casual listening all the way to guitar amp simulation and electronic music production, so the DT 770 truly blew me away.
Good luck, and let me know if I can offer any more help!
627
Thanks for such an ample answer! My main use for this headphones will be mixing and mastering EDM music, so I'm in search of a set of headphones that can transfer my mixes to monitors. :)
37599
Cool, glad I could help! The DT 770s have a slight bump in the low end, I was using them alongside KRK Rokit 8s which I believe also have a slight bump in the low end. :) The mixes translated very well between the two.
627
Thanks again! I ended up with Beyerdynamic DT 770 Pro 80 Ohm version. So excited! I'll return here with a review after I will put my hands and ears on it!
627
After I bought the DT 770 Pro 80 Ohm, I could not resist also buying the Audio Technica ATH-M50 headphones. For my music production and frequency response, I sticked with Audio Technica ATH-M50. I have a small head, so the DT 770 Pro were HUGE for me and also I liked the soundstage of the M50. The DT 770 Pro suits better for guitar, rock, jazz kinda sounds. The ATH-M50 are more for EDM music production which I belong. I wish I could stick with both because are both AWESOME but I cannot. Thanks for all the help! Much appreciated! :)
37599
Solid industry standard tuner & BOSS reliability
This is one of those pedals that kind of magically makes its way into your shopping cart and says, "Look, everyone else uses me, I'm relatively inexpensive, why would you buy any other tuner?" ... and it's kind of right. My buying decision was pretty much based on how popular the TU-2 is.
You get the Boss build quality and reliability, no issue there. Virtually indestructible. Nice display, easy to read in the dark. Another thing that's cool about it is if you have other Boss pedals, you can use this one to chain them all together and power them all. Oh and it tunes well, too :)
If I needed a new tuner today, maybe I'd get the TU-3 just because it's newer.
233
These are nice tuners. I'm really picky about My tuning, that is why I only use Peterson Strobe Tuners these days. Wish I could fine one of the older stage Peterson's with the 6" screen.
838
From the sounds of it, they can tune to a crazy standard, and also have a DI on it.
37599
Pretty awesome delay pedal & looper
The Line 6 DL4 is one of those pedals you almost have to go out and try simply because of it's popularity amongst guitarists. To be honest, I'm not much of a delay pedal snob. I haven't owned or tried enough delays to really understand the nuances. Maybe for that reason, the fact that this pedal models 16 echo and delay boxes is perfect for me. The guitar sound I really like to emulate is a Editors/Coldplay/Bloc Party sort of sound, and this pedal has plenty of options for that.
I'm a fan of looper pedals, so the onboard 14-second looper is really what sold me on this one. I saw it as a way to get a good looper and a variety of delays all in one box... at least until I build out my pedal collection and go deep on some delays. The loop function is super easy to use, and 14 seconds is plenty of time to record a substantial loop and jam on top of it - it's pretty satisfying sounding like a one man band!
The build quality is great, I've gigged with it and have had no issues. Admittedly the price is a little steep, but I've had this thing for so long and it has brought me so much enjoyment that I don't really think about what I paid for it.
I'd say an easy 4 or 4.5 stars out of 5 for the DL4. Even if you're a delay pedal purist or collector, try this one out, it might still have something to offer you.
44621
Have you tried TC's Flashback X4? I think nowadays is a better alternative in the same price league, and I think it's not as popular as the DL4 just for the fact of the many options you have around today while the DL4 made its way a time ago when the fact of far less competition helped turning it into the classic that today it is.
37599
I haven't tried the TC Electronics Flashback X4 - wow it looks so similar! Yeah I totally agree with you, the DL4 came out a while back and now everyone uses it. Next time I'm at the guitar store I will definitely play with the X4 and let you know what I think :)
44621
Yeah, the X4 is very similar at first sight as it doesn't overwhelm much more about the interface (indeed, it looks/feels even easier) while in fact it covers many other advanced features (useful and inspiring), I'll be waiting for your review then!
37599
It's an alright practice amp...
I bought this amp in 2008 as a practice amp I could easily carry anywhere without feeling like I was hauling around a ton of bricks - jamming with friends, traveling, etc. I like Orange as a brand, the Orange sound is pretty great. Aesthetically, it doesn't get much cooler than the, umm, Orange orange color. At the time I bought it I also liked that it had a headphones output, for quiet practice time.
Years have passed, and I gotta say I honestly haven't used it AS much as I thought I would. I'd probably say it's my needs that changed, rather than the amp being inadequate. Having said that, I'm not sure I'd buy it again if given the chance.
1) The sound is good, not great. It gets pretty loud for a practice amp, could probably handle a small-ish gig. Safe to say that you're not gonna get THE Orange sound. After all, it's a solid state amp, and it's made in China, not the UK. Distortion on it is good - it gets nice and crunchy, but nothing crazy. Would probably take pedals well, though I haven't tried myself. Reverb sounds pretty nice as well.
2) Build quality and durability isn't great - at least not in my case. Having handled the amp with care, and having kept it in storage for the last couple years, I expected everything to work just fine. I turned it on recently and BAM, hear a loud pop. Capacitor totally blew. Maybe I shouldn't be disappointed that something went wrong with the amp after ~6 years... the frustrating thing is how little I used it and that I took great care of it.
30
compared with marshall or fender amp?? i attempt 2 get an orange... i see white mystery and she use one orange with a rickenbaker guitar and sound great...
37599
I think Orange amps have certain unique qualities, and if artists you like use them, I would go for it :) I don't know if I would recommend this exact same amp that I have though. If you can, go for a tube amp!
77
I love my little orange I get enough 70s crunch with the button pushed and running the TS808 or the MUFF the amp handles it ,,true it aint no tube amp. not to shabby for a little old solid state ..and the spring reverb is F%%%$ awesome
37599
Nice comments ray_ibbeken, thanks. You convinced me to try a nice distortion pedal into the Orange :) Agreed on the reverb, it's solid!
141
I run a Marshall Guv'Nor 2 through it on a clean channel, and the light od it produces through the pedal is absolutely excellent. As long as you spend some good quality time on your EQ, you can really bring out the best in this amp
37599
Not perfect, but overall fantastic DAW
I've used Logic to write, record, arrange, mix, and master electronic music for the last few years. I'm very comfortable with the Apple ecosystem of apps, so when deciding between DAWs I naturally gravitated towards it. I used DAWs many years ago (Cakewalk) so I was already familiar with the general operation, but to learn the ins and outs of Logic I used "Logic Pro 9 Essential Training" from Lynda.com, and just followed along with all the videos.
I can't compare with Ableton, FL, Cubase, etc since I don't have experience with those, but I will say Logic Pro 9 has been a pleasure to learn and use. I think the best feature of a DAW is it's ability to sort of "stay out of the way" of the creative process, and Logic achieves that most of the way. Channel strips are great to recall your go-to plugin chains, the mixer view is intuitive, the piano roll is great, and the main arrange window is nice and provides lots of helpful context and menus around what you're doing.
If I had to point out a drawback, I would say it's automation, particularly snapping it to a grid. It can be infuriating snapping inflection points to the right places, in fact I think I've seen DJs complain on Twitter about how frustrating the automation can be.
And finally, Logic Pro 9's stock synths and plugins are nothing short of stellar. The ES M, ES1, ES2, and EXS24 (the sampler) are all very good synths in their own right. I've actually heard people say that if you are new to synthesis, you should exclusively learn ES1 and ES2 before moving on to third party synths (good advice I think). What I'm most impressed with is Logic's stock effects. Space Designer for reverb might be the only reverb you need. Channel EQ is a great equalizer (I stick one on every channel), the stereo spread fx are great, chorus/phaser/flanger and all that good stuff, and finally (very important for electronic music) the Compressor effect is pretty awesome. I was pretty new to compression, and Logic's Compressor helped me get a good grasp of it.
Version: Apple Logic Pro 937599
Back up your sh*t now!
GET ONE now! Use it to do regular Time Machine backups before it's too late and all your shit is gone. Because, inevitably, your precious hard drive will one day decide to eat it. This hard drive is super portable, and has a great aesthetic. The enclosure is metal and feels really good and high quality.
37599
Thin, light, powerful, and retina display is beautiful
On paper, it didn't seem like a huge upgrade from my old mbp. It's amazing though - they got rid of the optical drive and made it much lighter and thinner (almost like an Air), the battery life lasts significantly longer, and dat retina display is stunning!! Not cheap by any means, but WELL worth it.
Specs of mine are 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7, 16GB 1600 GHz DDR 3 memory, 500GB SSD.
37599
Great sound, polished all around
My in-ear headphone quest is over (for now). This is the most I've ever spent on earbuds, but no regrets so far. They sound great, bass is powerful, the highs are clear, and the build quality feels good. Very comfortable after extended use, no ear fatigue.
I like the flat cable, it tangles much less than a traditional round cable. Nice packaging too, which is something Beats does well (they come with a cool carrying case). These also come with three (if I remember right) different size ear pieces, so one of the three will hopefully fit you well.
Note that I wasn't looking for perfectly flat sound, so I won't judge them on that. In typical Beats fashion, I'd say these are optimized to make music sound a bit better, rather than reproduce it completely accurately.










