The monitor offers super accurate color for a non-Pro class display, with great contrast and minimal ghosting, and can be set to a custom 75Hz refresh rate.

The PB278Q uses a PLS panel, which is noted for better color reproduction and viewing angles compared to TN panels, though some argue AH-IPS panels in newer models are superior.

It's noted that the PB278Q may have changed its panel over time, leading to some dissatisfaction among users who experienced differences in performance or quality.

Enhanced gray level differentiation helps in identifying subtle compositing errors, particularly useful for VFX and motion graphics work.

Owners praise the monitor for its fantastic performance even when purchased used, citing excellent color accuracy and reliability over multiple years.

Owners report that the ASUS PB278Q skips frames when overclocked, unlike some Korean monitors like Qnix QX2710 which can successfully handle overclocking past 60Hz without issues.

High pixel density can make UI elements appear awkwardly sized on Windows, suggesting possible compatibility issues with certain setups.

Stuck pixels may occur but tend to become unnoticeable over time, indicating minor long-term impact on usability.

At a purchase price of $130, the monitor is considered an exceptional deal compared to its retail price of around $300.

The BenQ BL2710PT is compared favorably for faster pixel response times and the lack of PWM dimming, a feature where the ASUS PB278Q falls short.

Some users report edge spilling noticeable on dark scenes and a slightly glossy screen finish, which may impact viewing for specific tasks.

Despite edge spill, the monitor's color representation effectively supports tasks like Maya work and color grading in film production.