Alexander Metzger, also known as Alex Butcher (associated with World of Intros, Vengeance Sound, and Refx), is shown using the Sonnox Oxford EQ in a Facebook photo.

Excerpt from interview:

How do Sonnox plug-ins fit into your productions?

I’ve been using Sonnox for quite some time, but since they’ve been 32-bit / 64-bit, I’ve really noticed a massive sonic difference. They really have overtaken the best analogue equivalent now. For instance last year Eric and I produced The Breeze - an Appreciation of JJ Cale – among others Guest Artists we had Tom Petty and John Mayer sharing lead vocals with Eric. So a classic JJ Cale trick would be to put a stereo compressor across all the vocals and pull them forward. In Pro Tools, I would have a backing vocal bus which is often a good idea, but also I had a bus dedicated to the two lead vocals, panned slightly left or right and I then used the Sonnox Dynamics & EQ, stereo linked to just hold everything in place and fine tune the EQ. It’s really quite fantastic what you can do with it. I would say 50% of a really great record, has to be the vocals.

With the Eric Clapton project, you did surround and stereo?

Yes. Check out the Blu-ray if you can! The Surround is stunning, especially at 32-bit / 96kHz. On this project, we effectively built a Sonnox Oxford ‘console’ in the box by using the bussing within Pro Tools. I had all the tracks routed to one 5.1 buss, and across that I created what felt like a Classic Neve Surround Summing Mixer, using the Full Oxford Dynamics, GML EQ, and then finally the Oxford Limiter, which is really quite an incredible tool.

It’s great to have the GML Option for more sophisticated EQing, but all of the settings have their own benefits. Type 1 is more like an SSL 4000 for instance, Type 2 you can pull out frequencies such at those on toms. Type 3 is more like a Neve to my ear and I think of Type 4 as Mastering.

Finding the Magic frequency

All singers have a magic frequency and some have more than one. So for instance Tom Petty is more mid-range. Michael McDonald has some wonderful overtones, so 12k is always going to bring out the air. This all depends on the key, recording microphone, EQ etc. But as a rule you can usually find that frequency and bring out the character of the voice. One of the most useful things with the Sonnox EQ is how you can grab a frequency and fine-tune it with the mouse to look for that magic spot.

Sonnox Mixer in the Box

Sometimes I get great results by splitting the outputs of Pro Tools in pairs through a studio console, or a summing mixer then inserting EQ and compression across the master buss. But if you don’t have the luxury of a $250k console, you can re-create this using Sonnox in the Box. Let’s say for example I’ve got 16 busses on a surround project, I can literally put Sonnox EQ on every one of those busses (as opposed to master faders if summing externally). Then by linking them together and adding a shelf @ 12kHz, I can add a little bit of presence. Because the EQ’s are linked on parallel busses, when you sweep through parameters on one, it’s automatically mirrored on all the others. This is a brilliant feature so you don’t have to do so much individually EQing ( helps phase coherence too.) Then for the final ‘icing on the cake’ I usually group all of those master busses together and put a VCA across that group. This becomes the equivalent of your master fader on a console - then with one touch you can control how much you’re effectively pushing into the Sonnox ‘mixer’ that you’ve made. In essence, I effectively recreate a vintage Neve mixer and outboard inside Pro Tools, using only Sonnox plug-ins! This is very useful if you’re mixing an entire album or show - when it comes to matching track levels.

How did you get turned onto Sonnox plug ins?

Well, when I came down here to The Hit Factory around 2000, they had an Oxford console That console was the one that made a lot of sense to me. From there, I got used to the sound of their EQ’s.

So which Oxfords do use?

The EQ and the Trans Mod.

You have a lot of different EQs, so why the Oxford?

Well, because it’s the first digital EQ that I got used to using, and really learned the curve on. It’s a great general EQ and when I want something smooth and transparent, that’s the one that I will turn to.

The Oxford EQ can be seen throughout this video https://youtu.be/trDQhqTd9f0?t=8, first appearing on screen at after 8 seconds.